The Bombay High Court dismissed a PIL claiming PRADA’s sandals infringed the GI rights of Kolhapuri Chappals. Here’s why only registered GI holders can sue—and what it means for protecting cultural heritage.

Can a luxury fashion brand use a traditional Indian name or design without permission?

That was the heart of a recent public interest litigation (PIL) filed against PRADA, alleging that its “Toe Ring Sandals” resembled the Kolhapuri Chappals—a product protected under India’s Geographical Indications (GI) Act.

The Bombay High Court, however, dismissed the petition, citing that only registered GI holders have the right to sue for infringement—not third-party advocates acting in public interest.

This case is a sharp reminder that while cultural identity deserves protection, enforcement must follow legal procedures and proper standing.