The trademark disputes between Apple Inc. and Apple Corps started in the 1970s and finally reached to a settlement in 2007. While the specific settlement remained undisclosed, it is believed that Apple Inc. acquired all "Apple"-related trademarks from Apple Corps and subsequently licensed them back for the record label for continued use.
While the scent may vary, these unique fragrances aim to evoke and enhance customers experience of stepping into a brand-new car. This highlights the significance of sensory elements, like smell, in branding and customer engagement.
Preserving Malaysia's Cultural Legacy through Intellectual Property Rights. From protecting 'Nasi Lemak' with Geographical Indications to safeguarding the iconic Petronas Towers and traditional knowledge, Malaysia celebrates its heritage on the global stage.
Even shoe soles has Trademark protection! As long as your creation is unique, your Intellectual Property has commercialization value in it. So be sure to protect it. Reach out for more.
Unlock the Hidden Value of Your Intellectual Property!
From serving as collateral for loans to generating income through licensing and royalties, your IP assets are more powerful than you think. Discover how you can bundle and securitize your IP into tradable financial instruments, attract investors with its indicative value, and turn your creativity into cash flow.
Dive into the landmark case of McDonald's Corporation v. Future Enterprises Pvt Ltd!
This pivotal trademark infringement suit highlights the vital importance of safeguarding well-known trademarks and the serious implications of unauthorized use.
The outcome of this case emphasizes the necessity of trademark registration and robust enforcement of intellectual property rights in the global market.
Understanding Trade Dress: It's more than just a logo! Trade dress protection covers the unique visual appearance of a product or its packaging, making your brand stand out in the market. From distinct designs to color schemes, learn how to safeguard your brand identity.
This case established that color can be registered as a trademark under certain circumstances, emphasizing the importance of non-traditional marks in trademark law.
Adidas has filed a suit against clothing retailer Forever 21, claiming that the retailer's three-stripe design on products constitutes a counterfeit product. Adidas claims it has put millions into branding the three-stripe design and holds numerous patents on it.
The Wrigley Co. wanted to trademark the name “Doublemint,” which seems reasonable enough. But in Europe, it can’t. The ruling against Wrigley stated that the word “Doublemint” lacks an imaginative element. Comparatively, Procter & Gamble succeeded in trademarking "Baby-Dry," showcasing the contrasting outcomes in trademark registration based on the perceived distinctiveness or imaginative aspect of the names in question.
